A Virginia lawmaker is calling on the Air Force to reverse a decision to remove a Latin reference to “God” from a logo after an atheist group complained.
he Air Force removed the logo several weeks ago from the Rapid Capabilities Office. The patch included a line written in Latin that read, “Doing God’s Work with Other People’s Money.”
But after the Military Association of Atheists and Freethinkers complained, Forbes said the line was rewritten in Latin to read, “Doing Miracles with Other People’s Money.”
Forbes said the removal of “God” is a “bridge too far in terms of the rights of men and women who serve in our services and their ability to express their faith.”
“But the significance of this is what the Air Force is saying with this move – that the word ‘God’ – whether it has any reference to faith or not, can’t be used in the Air Force,

- Enjoy this article? Help vote it up the 'Vine.
- Public Discussion (30)
Sorry folks,
I'm a Christian who believes in a separation of church and state, but I think this is wrong.
They change the word God into miracles, but the definition of miracle is " an extraordinary event manifesting divine intervention in human affairs"
I have to say, atheists, deal with it.
Comments?
Not a battle worth fighting in my opinion, but as a christian how would you feel if it had referenced another god? Especially if you were a member of the air force? Praise be to Odin? It would be tough on you I bet. Try to see things from our perspective, we are the minority in an overwhelmingly religious country, receiving death threats for simply not believing and having to fight to uphold the constitution at every turn.
- 6 votes
how would you feel if it had referenced another god?
Very good point,..
- 2 votes
Didn't know the USAF logo ever referenced my Lord. I know the Army doesn't. Think the change is hilarious though:
"Doing Miracles with Other People's Money."
Reminds me of the middle finger that Georgia gave its detractors when buckling to political pressure and removing a version of the Battle Flag of the Confederacy from it's old state flag - only to adopt the actual Confederate flag and just put the state seal within it.
- 1 vote
The AF logo doesn't reference God; this is (well, was) just the motto of one relatively small acquisition office.
- 1 vote
I've never understood the need Christians have for references to their god being plastered all over anything, including planes. In fact, I'm pretty sure Jesus said something about wearing one's religion on one's sleeve, and not in a good way.
For crying out loud...does this really hurt your personal faith in your deity? No? Then please try to accept that this is a nation of religious freedom and not everyone is monotheistic.
- 6 votes
Praise be to Odin?
I'd be cool with that one. Of course, as an agnostic I'm something of an outlier in the AF anyway...
The U.S. does not wage wars of religion, so the extraction of the word God was appropriate. On the other hand, everyone can use a miracle now and then,...
- 5 votes
Baron,
I see your point, however, it would be one thing if they decided to put in the word "God" it's another to be forced to take it out after so many decades ....can you appreciate the difference?
To a degree. But something having been in place for a long time does not mean that it has been correct for a long time. Endorsing any religion in a government agency defies the constitution.
- 3 votes
I don't see God as being any particular religion...but I guess you would like the phrase "In God we Trust" removed off of everything?
Preferably yes, but that's not a battle worth fighting in my opinion. I don't feel that the phrase is particularly oppressive, just as I didn't feel the air force reference was overly offensive. However, if we are to adhere to the constitution it should be removed.
- 4 votes
but I guess you would like the phrase "In God we Trust" removed off of everything?
I would like to see it removed, yes. And how exactly is "God" not religious????? The Christians in this country think "God" is their god's name! If it was supposed to be generic it would be plural, to include all gods. But no reference to gods can be non-religious.
"Faith" does not belong in the government. People are free to be as religious or non-religious as they want, but the long term survival of religious freedom DEPENDS on the separation of church and state.
- 5 votes
...but I guess you would like the phrase "In God we Trust" removed off of everything?
Absolutely! Not only was god NOT in the original motto, it's unconstitutiopnal at its core.
I don't see God as being any particular religion
Most peoiple associate "God" with their particular religion. So yes, it has a religious cannotation.
it would be one thing if they decided to put in the word "God" it's another to be forced to take it out after so many decades ....can you appreciate the difference?
There is no difference. Just because something has been there a long time doesn't make it right.
- 5 votes
I guess you would like the phrase "In God we Trust" removed off of everything?
Think of it this way... on arguably America's most prominent document, its money, they have added a characteristic that defines the set which consists of, and is know as, Americans, i.e. Americans trust in God. So by inference if you don't trust in God, you aren't an American (which was actually stated explicitly by Bush I). I fail to see how those that support this "motto" on our money cannot see this is offensive to some Americans. However, I strongly suspect that indeed they can see it, they just don't give a @!$%#...
- 5 votes
Honestly, I don't really take offense to it. For me, my reaction to "God" on our money, logos and slogans is "meh, whatever". However, the problem is, far too many use these examples to insist that the United States is in fact a Christian nation and therefore our laws should support and push Christian beliefs. They used their political influence to push "God" into the Govt. then used that to further push Christian beliefs into the Govt. Don't get the wrong idea though, I don't mind those of faith, I just don't want to be forced to live by the rules they hold for themselves. It's perfectly reasonable to be expected to live by rules that can be explained through logic. Rules that can only be explained through "God(something or someone that cannot be proven to exist with the resources we have right now) said so" are not reasonable to me.
- 2 votes
Honestly, I don't really take offense to it.
Yeah OK, I understand... pick your battles... don't rock the boat... don't blow things out of proportion... I get it. It's a good thing Rosa Parks didn't take this attitude when she was told to move to the back of the bus... just sayin'...
- 4 votes
Big difference, the word "God" on our stuff doesn't hurt me(at least not directly, but see #5 for more on that). Being forced to obey religious laws hurt me. Being denied equal rights hurt me.
- 1 vote
Big difference, the word "God" on our stuff doesn't hurt me(at least not directly, but see #5 for more on that).
Let me ask you this... what if the "motto" was something like "we are a nation of Caucasians?" Would that hurt anyone? FYI, demeaning someone is hurtful!
- 3 votes
This is not a big deal; the entire motto of that office is tongue-in-cheek
- 1 vote
While this is not a good example itself, the pervasive breaking of the separation of church and state IS a problem. It gives the impression that the US is a Christian nation. I have a co-worker who is Canadian who was arguing just that point. He thinks it MUST be Christian nation because of all the references to "God". "It's even on the money" he says. I try to explain that it was put on the money in the 1950's and does not belong there....but the damage is done. These smaller incidents may appear (and may even be) insignificant, but the sum total of these little "oopses" is a BIG problem.
It does seem that its use was not literal in this sense, more of a military joke really, but there are other examples where it is important to make a change. And apparently not everyone got the part where it was a joke!
- 6 votes
That's a good point, these things also give the wrong impression of us to the outside world as well.
- 2 votes
God is Judeo-Christian, not just Christian....
.Kozakura, you say it might give the wrong impression of us to the outside world, but would you rather have the world think of us as a godless nation, like the Soviet Union, or Red China?
I would not.
- 1 vote
God is Judeo-Christian, not just Christian....
Your god maybe. But then, there are thousands of gods to choose from.
but would you rather have the world think of us as a godless nation, like the Soviet Union, or Red China?
We are a secular nation.
- 3 votes
but would you rather have the world think of us as a godless nation, like the Soviet Union, or Red China?
I would prefer the world not think of us in terms of religion at all, but in terms of setting an example for how a nation can be secular AND highly successful.
- 3 votes
We are a secular nation.
I asked the question again,
would you rather have the world think of us as a godless nation, like the Soviet Union, or Red China?
Yes, or no?
- 1 vote
How about like Scandinavia? How about being a godless nation like the nations with the highest quality of life. Trading the dogma of god for the dogma of communism is a lateral move. The dogmatic thinking continues. In that way, I would say that communism is just as much a religion as christianity. They just worship different things.
- 3 votes
Yes, I would like to the outside world to see our nation as godless. Our PEOPLE may choose to believe or not as they wish (unlike the Soviet Union or China) but our NATION has no god and no religion. It is a secular entity.
- 2 votes
Trading the dogma of god for the dogma of communism is a lateral move. The dogmatic thinking continues. In that way, I would say that communism is just as much a religion as christianity.
Yes, that is why totalitarian regimes often ban religion, it is competition an they want the government to totally control the people. In lieu of that some totalitarian regimes choose a single religion that THEY control and force everyone to follow it (much of the world for much of history).
- 2 votes
“Doing God’s Work with Other People’s Money.”
I would think they would be more interested in the Other People's Money part!
Or does God approve of deficit spending?
- 2 votes
You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead. |



