Newsvine
  • Welcome
  • Help
  • Report Bug
  • Conversation Tracker
  • Your Column
  • Replies
  • Friends
Type Comments Since You Last CheckedArticle Source Last Checked Stop Tracking All Clear Tracking All
Advertise | AdChoices
Log In | Register
Close the Login Panel
Existing users log in below. New users please register for a free account.

New Users:

Existing Users:

E-Mail:
Password:
Forgot Password?
Please enter the e-mail address or domain name you registered with:
E-Mail/Domain:
Back to Login
Log Out
  • Top News
  • Local News
  • World
  • U.S.
  • Sports
  • Politics
  • Tech
  • Entertainment
  • Science
  • Business
  • Health
  • Odd News
  • More
    • Arts
    • Education
    • Environment
    • Fashion
    • History
    • Home & Garden
    • Not News
    • Religion
    • Travel
Visit rescue dogs62's column >>

RESCUE DOGS62

Southern California
Articles Posted: 25  Links Seeded: 2389
Member Since: 9/2008  Last Seen: 5/20/2012

What is Newsvine?

Updated continuously by citizens like you, Newsvine is an instant reflection of what the world is talking about at any given moment.

Get a Free Account
Help
Fun Stuff
  • Your Clippings
  • Leaderboard
  • E-Mail Alerts
  • Top of the Vine
  • Newsvine Live
  • Newsvine Archives
  • The Greenhouse
  • Recommended Articles
  • Wall of Vineness
Put a Seed Newsvine link on your own site

Israel dismisses warnings from US about attacking Iran

Seeded on Wed Feb 22, 2012 7:35 PM EST
Read ArticleArticle Source: TheHill.com
us-news, iran, israel, united-states, national-security, preemptive-strike
Seeded by rescue dogs62
Advertise | AdChoices

Israel’s foreign minister on Wednesday said it's not the business of the United States whether his country decides to attack Iran.

Foreign Minister Avigor Lieberman said that warnings from the United States and Russia about an attack would not affect Israel’s decision-making. 

“[It] is not their business,

 

  • Enjoy this article? Help vote it up the 'Vine.

Published to:

  • rescue dogs62's Column, All of Newsvine
  • Groups: 112th United States Congress, Absolutely No Boundaries, American_Politics, cheapdirtystuntsbyGOPfascists, Citizens Against Apathy, Clinton Conservatives, FIRED UP DEMOCRATS!, Get On Your Soapbox, GOP Primaries, Grey Boomers, Unite!, Left of Center, Mad As Hell!! Aren't You??, Newsvine HONOR Vine, Obama Supporters, Politics in USA, RepubliCON Watch, Rightwingnutjobs, Seeders and Posters w/ Manners, US News and Views , World News and Views
  • Regions: none
  • Public Discussion (28)
rescue dogs62

It certainly IS our business. Do they think if Iran decides to attack they are only going to target Israel. If the Arab world becomes enraged, we are the friend, supporter, and supplier of arms and money to Israel, and even if we're not attacked we would definitely enter the war to assist Israel. I find it fascinating that Netanyahu, speaking to settlers a couple of years ago, when he didn't realize he was being recorded, stated that the U.S. was a puppet of Israel, and they could make us do whatever they wanted.

Quite a mindset.

  • 3 votes
Reply#1 - Wed Feb 22, 2012 7:46 PM EST
Jonathan-1917156

And people still think Israel is a reliable ally? Must be some good drugs they smokin.

  • 2 votes
#1.1 - Wed Feb 22, 2012 11:59 PM EST
Reply
Jalmeno

Virtually all punditry on this topic ignores the major, sweeping all-encompassing fact that Israel's risk is completely different, and much greater than that of any other country in the world. Iran's bombs can reach any number of countries, but they are only aimed at Israel. A nuke attached to any of those missiles would eliminate as much as half of Israel's population. It IS Israel's business - separate from the US - because no other country has what Israel has at stake. Furthermore, if the conflict should cool off without a shot, and Iran succeeds in creating nuclear bombs, they will use this power to intimidate other nations, most notably their Sunni adversaries.

America has a different view of their risk, as do Russia, China and other nations affected by the price of oil. These countries are concerned about their economic well being, and rightly so. A major conflict in the region would result in a steep increase in the price of oil. This is serious, if you want to discuss economic repercussions. But it does not pose the existential threat to a county's very existence, as in the case of Israel. On that basis alone, economic considerations pale.

If you want to attribute Israeli/US relations on the basis of a single comment made by Netanyahu, be my guest. It doesn't apply to anything that's going on here. I believe Obama was miked up with Sarkozy in a backroom once and made inappropriate comments about Netanyahu. This also does not apply to the situation at hand.

  • 3 votes
Reply#2 - Wed Feb 22, 2012 9:39 PM EST
Loozerio

If you want to attribute Israeli/US relations on the basis of a single comment made by Netanyahu, be my guest

As if your invitation were required to make such an obvious attribution.

It doesn't apply to anything that's going on here.

Really?

  • 2 votes
#2.1 - Wed Feb 22, 2012 11:05 PM EST
rescue dogs62

Jalmeno,

Are you so sure that our only concern is our oil. Iran had a sub off the west coast of the U.S. We have our Fifth fleet off of Bahrain, and Iran's war ships have been in the area. Whether Iran was saber rattling they made it quite clear that they'll go for both the U.S. and Israel. As far as I'm concerned my concern has absolutely nothing to do with oil.

We are the "leaders" of the increased sanctions that are making the lives of the Persians hell, and very angry with their leadership. We have pushed them into a corner, and cornered rats do strange things.

  • 3 votes
#2.2 - Thu Feb 23, 2012 8:20 PM EST
onefan51

But it does not pose the existential threat to a county's very existence, as in the case of Israel. On that basis alone, economic considerations pale.

Jalmeno

Since when has it become acceptable for the tail wagged the dog. I know we disagree and we probably will never agree on this topic. But I'm more concerned with the existence of the United States than Israel. Yes, Israel has a right to exist and the United States strongly supports that right.

Iran also has a right to exist. The problem is Israel attacking Iran without the approval of the United States. Don't forget that Israel is as strong as it only because of America's support. The development of nuclear weapons by Iran and how that country develops and deploys such weapons is all conjecture at this point.

Once the shots are fired they can't be unfired. And as far as Israel and its supporters are concerned once the shots are fired, may the repercussions for what happens to the United States and others afterwards be damn. And the repercussions won't just be economic.

You can bet the farm that if an attack occurs American lives will be lost. Israel isn't the only country that has the right to exist in peace. So does the United States and it is Israel's closest and best friend. If Israel doesn't give a damn about hurting its closest and best friend by conducting a preemptive attack on Iran, then what the hell are friends for?

  • 3 votes
#2.3 - Thu Feb 23, 2012 9:03 PM EST
rescue dogs62

onefan51

The problem is Israel attacking Iran without the approval of the United States.

They aren't even looking for our approval, they said they wouldn't even give us notice before hand.

  • 2 votes
#2.4 - Thu Feb 23, 2012 9:24 PM EST
onefan51

They aren't even looking for our approval, they said they wouldn't even give us notice before hand

Thanks for the clarification, rescue. Who needs friends when you have enemies?

In the End, we will remember not the words of our enemies, but the silence of our friends." ~ Martin Luther King Jr.

  • 3 votes
#2.5 - Thu Feb 23, 2012 9:56 PM EST
Reply
Polka14

If it is not our business then Israel should not expect the US to aid it in any way in an unprovoked attack on Iran. That would be a good thing to declare neutrality.

  • 2 votes
Reply#3 - Wed Feb 22, 2012 9:52 PM EST
Jalmeno

But the US is not neutral. Nor is Russia, China, Turkey, Saudi Arabia or India, or for that matter, any country that sees most of its oil travel through the Strait of Hormuz.

Nobody is neutral when the atmosphere has to deal with an above-ground atomic explosion in a heavily populated area.

You can't stick your head in the sand and pretend the problem is gone.

  • 3 votes
#3.1 - Wed Feb 22, 2012 9:58 PM EST
Polka14

Maybe it is a good time to replace fossil fuels with solar power. We certainly shouldn't get involved with this ridiculous rivalry between the Israelis and the Iranians. If Iran nukes Israel then they can expect a couple hundred to hit them in retaliation so I think all this talk about them building nukes is fearmongering like the rush to war in Iraq. Nothing but needless provocation.

  • 2 votes
#3.2 - Wed Feb 22, 2012 10:04 PM EST
Jalmeno

Maybe it is a good time to replace fossil fuels with solar power

We're working on that, as well as a wind program. That probably won't be good for more than 10% of our consumption, even at peak.

Between the US and Canada, there are some estimates that peg natural gas reserves at 500 to 1,000 years supply for auto fuel. If every passenger and commercial vehicle in America ran on LNG, we'd be a net exporter of oil. That would render OPEC moot, and give us a chance to sever ties with countries that hate us.

  • 2 votes
#3.3 - Wed Feb 22, 2012 10:08 PM EST
Loozerio

we'd be a net exporter of oil.

That's pretty much already happening due to reduced demand in the U.S., however...

That would render OPEC moot, and give us a chance to sever ties with countries that hate us.

Would it be fair to say that what you really wish for is that if this were to be the case, Israel could then, with impunity, lay waste to Iran? Hey, while they're at it, maybe they could provoke a @!$%#storm that spreads to the eastern end of southwestern Asia and beyond.

  • 2 votes
#3.4 - Wed Feb 22, 2012 11:23 PM EST
JalmenoDeleted
Loozerio

Loozer,

Voted up for CoH violation.

If that's what I wished, I would have posted it.

That's doubtful.

Try not to be a mind reader, and read posts for what they are.

You're protestations only reassure us that there was indeed an underlying motivation.

Had you read the thread, you'd have taken note that the discussion was about oil dependency, not Israel.

Ooooookay......chortlesnicker....

  • 1 vote
#3.6 - Thu Feb 23, 2012 5:59 PM EST
JalmenoDeleted
rescue dogs62

This is my seed and I usually never leave my seeds unattended, but unfortunately I had a doctor's appointment. I do monitor CoH violations, I apologize Loozerio.

People can disagree with another poster, but you must show respect for them.

Jaimeno,

two of your posts have been deleted because you did not. I will continue, if you continue. See if you can have a appropriate disagreement.

  • 3 votes
#3.8 - Thu Feb 23, 2012 8:27 PM EST
Reply
onefan51

If Israel attacks Iran, the fighting will spread across the region like a wildfire. The region is already unstable. And the repercussions of an attack will be felt on a global scale, especially in the areas of commerce and finance.

I remember the OPEC oil embargo in the 1970's. There was gas rationing and long lines here in the U.S. If Israel attacks Iran there probably won't be any long lines because there may not be any gas to ration.

  • 3 votes
Reply#4 - Wed Feb 22, 2012 10:22 PM EST
Jimi Maynard

Looks like the whole world is doing it's best to make the Mayan prediction come true!!!

But we all know it's all bull to drive up the price of oil ,don't we ???? You don't think the people in charge in Israel don't have money invested in oil and will make more with the war game playing. Tell me why when there's a problem with the flow of oil the profits go up and up for the big oil companies and public seems pay more and more ,shouldn't they be losing money too or is it me. .

  • 2 votes
Reply#5 - Wed Feb 22, 2012 11:20 PM EST
rescue dogs62

Jimi,

Right now the price oil is being driven up by the oil speculators. Another thing we have to thank Wall Street for. We are exporting oil.

  • 3 votes
#5.1 - Thu Feb 23, 2012 8:29 PM EST
Reply
jdl-28

Would it be the US concern if they stop giving money to Israel , the US been supporting this country for years and get nothing in return it is time to stop. I have and will always believe Israel is a country that is a waste for all they do is start fighting with everyone over there, we need to stop supplying them with weapons period. If they do start this war we need to stay out of it, if Israel lose so be it.

  • 1 vote
Reply#6 - Thu Feb 23, 2012 6:47 AM EST
ed-1874584

the US been supporting this country for years and get nothing in return

This is patently false. The grant given to Israel through the Foreign Military Financing program is directed by the State Department and all the money is spent here. If fact, this money never actually leaves the US. This bolsters the US economy by providing work to people in the US and actually removes jobs from Israel. Just looking at the financial side, people in the US benefit more from the FMF program than people in Israel. Outside the financial realm, we get the benefit of field tested military hardware for use in US systems.

Read more about it here:

http://www.state.gov/t/pm/ppa/sat/c14560.htm

    #6.1 - Fri Feb 24, 2012 10:01 AM EST
    Reply
    rescue dogs62

    jdl,

    Yes, we have been sending money and weapons to Israel, but for a myriad of reasons we will not desert her, nor do I think we should. However I'm extremely concerned about the effects that will occur if they do decide to attack. Among other things Israel is the only democracy in the Middle East., for Christians, Jews and even Muslims, Jerusalem is extremely important.

    The U.S. will not abandoned Israel.

    • 2 votes
    Reply#7 - Thu Feb 23, 2012 8:34 PM EST
    rescue dogs62

    http://www.csmonitor.com/2002/1209/p16s01-wmgn.html

    The US has given $2.5 billion to support Israel's Lavi fighter and Arrow missile projects.

    • Israel buys discounted, serviceable "excess" US military equipment. Stauffer says these discounts amount to "several billion dollars" over recent years.

    • Israel uses roughly 40 percent of its $1.8 billion per year in military aid, ostensibly earmarked for purchase of US weapons, to buy Israeli-made hardware. It also has won the right to require the Defense Department or US defense contractors to buy Israeli-made equipment or subsystems, paying 50 to 60 cents on every defense dollar the US gives to Israel.

    US help, financial and technical, has enabled Israel to become a major weapons supplier. Weapons make up almost half of Israel's manufactured exports. US defense contractors often resent the buy-Israel requirements and the extra competition subsidized by US taxpayers.

    • US policy and trade sanctions reduce US exports to the Middle East about $5 billion a year, costing 70,000 or so American jobs, Stauffer estimates. Not requiring Israel to use its US aid to buy American goods, as is usual in foreign aid, costs another 125,000 jobs.

    • Israel has blocked some major US arms sales, such as F-15 fighter aircraft to Saudi Arabia in the mid-1980s. That cost $40 billion over 10 years, says Stauffer.

    http://wrmea.org/component/content/article/245-2008-november/3845-congress-watch-a-conservative-estimate-of-total-direct-us-aid-to-israel-almost-114-billion.

    http://ifamericansknew.org/stats/cost_of_israel.html

    You might wade through the last one in particular

    It was written by Richard H. Curtis

    he served as a career Foreign Service officer with the Department of State and the U.S. Information Agency throughout the world and in Washington D.C. During his U.S. government career he received the U.S. Information Agency’s Superior Honor Award and the Edward R. Murrow award for excellence in Public Diplomacy, U.S.I.A.’s highest professional recognition.

    Curtiss is currently the Executive Editor of theWashington Report on Middle East Affairs

    • 3 votes
    Reply#8 - Fri Feb 24, 2012 2:14 PM EST
    Loozerio

    Excellent Friend rescue dogs62, looks like you just slammed the door closed on Ed's argument @ 6.1. Notice how Ed called jdl's statement..

    the US been supporting this country for years and get nothing in return

    ..not just false, but...wait for it...patently false...gollygosh...just makes the sound of the door slamming that much louder.

    • 3 votes
    #8.1 - Fri Feb 24, 2012 3:14 PM EST
    ed-1874584

    ..not just false, but...wait for it...patently false...gollygosh...just makes the sound of the door slamming that much louder.

    Interesting viewpoint but nothing he posted makes the fact that US gets nothing in return patently false. We benefit from the FMF relationship. A ten year old post from the Christian Science Monitor doesn't change it. I'm also not concerned by what anyone on ifamericansknew thinks. If you want to know where the money go, go read the link.

    Gollygosh. Have fun high fiving yourself after your cute little comments.

      #8.2 - Fri Feb 24, 2012 5:21 PM EST
      rescue dogs62

      As I said before, your link about about military spending only, and if you look at other data, it was only in 2010 that it was mandated that the military money be spent on hardware here..I also did a computer search and found a number of other articles including PDF files and some governmental files. You are incorrect. I agree with you that the U.S. gets nothing in return is false.

      The grant given to Israel through the Foreign Military Financing program is directed by the State Department and all the money is spent here.

      Your statement is not true, and perhaps you'd like to look at money that's given to them through a number of different programs and appropriations other than the "foreign military financing program."

      • 3 votes
      #8.3 - Fri Feb 24, 2012 5:50 PM EST
      Loozerio

      Gollygosh. Have fun high fiving yourself after your cute little comments

      Nah, gotta sort gear for ice climbing tomorrow, but thanks.

      • 2 votes
      #8.4 - Fri Feb 24, 2012 6:23 PM EST
      ed-1874584

      Your statement is not true, and perhaps you'd like to look at money that's given to them through a number of different programs and appropriations other than the "foreign military financing program."

      My statement is true. I am speaking specifically about the FMF program and I was addressing the statement that we get nothing in return.

      it was only in 2010 that it was mandated that the military money be spent on hardware here

      This statement is not true.

        #8.5 - Fri Feb 24, 2012 6:57 PM EST
        Reply
        rescue dogs62

        Thanks, Loozerio

        I don't think we should abandon Israel, but I think we still need to be clear on our relationship.

        • 3 votes
        Reply#9 - Fri Feb 24, 2012 3:59 PM EST
        Leave a Comment:
        You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
        You're in XHTML Mode. If you prefer, you can use Easy Mode instead.
        (XHTML tags allowed - a,b,blockquote,br,code,dd,dl,dt,del,em,h2,h3,h4,i,ins,li,ol,p,pre,q,strong,ul)
        Newsvine Privacy Statement
        As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.
        FUN STUFF:
        • Leaderboard |
        • E-Mail Alerts |
        • Top of the Vine |
        • Newsvine Live |
        • Newsvine Archives |
        • The Greenhouse |
        COMPANY STUFF:
        • Code of Honor |
        • Company Info |
        • Contact Us |
        • Jobs |
        • User Agreement |
        • Privacy Policy |
        • About our ads
        LEGAL STUFF:
        • © 2005-2012 Newsvine, Inc. |
        • Newsvine® is a registered trademark of Newsvine, Inc. |
        • Newsvine is a property of msnbc.com